All fields are required.

Close Appointment form

Designing the Home Fire Sprinkler System to Survive

Designing the Home Fire Sprinkler System to Survive

17 Comments

Before a fire sprinkler system in a house can help protect its occupants from a fire, it has to survive at least two difficult obstacles. First, it has to be tough enough to last through possible neglect from its owners. Second, it must be able to handle the cold stuff that Mother Nature can throw at it. This article will discuss how a home fire sprinkler system can need only minimal maintenance and survive the nasty winter surprises through proper design and material choice.

One thing a house has to endure is its occupants. Homeowners do not always follow through on things that need to be done. “Change your air filter on your HVAC system”; “change your batteries in your smoke alarms”; ”clean you rain gutters”, and countless other reminders are continually bombarding us. Why, because many of us will NOT DO THEM if left on our own. Some maintenance must be done to live in a safe home. However, reducing required maintenance should be a primary objective.

Other fire sprinkler codes (NFPA13 – commercial buildings and NFPA 13R- for apartments and condos) both require at least one professional inspection every year and require a 24/7 electronic alarm that ensures valves are not being tampered with and a number of other items. These systems are designed with an understanding that they will be regularly maintained by trained professionals.

This is NOT the case with home fire sprinklers. None of these frills are involved with a 13D system (NFPA 13D is the standard for fire sprinklers used in single and two family homes). It will only get the maintenance that the homeowner is willing to give it. This is where purposeful design comes into play.

The 13D code goes a long way in helping a designer make an almost maintenance free automatic fire sprinkler system. It requires only the standard operating water pressure of the domestic (regular household) plumbing system. This is a huge factor in simplifying the design. Other sprinkler codes (NFPA13 – commercial and NFPA 13R- for apartments and condos) require that they have a fire department connection installed. This means that a fire truck can pull up near the building and hook up a hose to the structure’s sprinkler system to pressurize it with the pump on the fire truck. While this effectively increases the efficiency of the sprinkler system by increasing the water pressure, it requires the sprinkler system to be piped out of material that can withstand water pressure at least twice what the normal plumbing system in your house would need. Necessary standards like this reduce the material options for the designer in 13 and 13R systems. Because of its light weight and ability to handle the pressure and heat, CPVC plastic has worked well, especially in 13R systems, and has become the standard.

A 13D fire sprinkler system only has to operate at normal house water pressure. No fire department connection is needed. This has opened the door for a “multipurpose” system with the domestic water (unheard of in 13 or 13R systems). A multipurpose system (sometimes called “flow-through”) allows the sprinkler and the domestic plumbing to use the same water. For the first time, a fire sprinkler system does not have to have a dedicated water supply. A multipurpose system also means that an anti-backflow prevention device is not needed since the water in the sprinkler system is not stagnate as in a “stand alone” system. The water in a multipurpose system is potable since it is an extension of the domestic plumbing. [Usually, the water closets (toilets) are fed by the water in the sprinkler system. When a toilet is flushed, fresh water flows through the sprinkler system.] Having no anti-backflow device means there is one less part to fail in the future and one less item to be maintained.

Also, when using the 13D multipurpose design, as long as the pipe is rated for use in fire systems, a designer is permitted to use other types of piping materials. One of the newer choices of pipe is crossed-linked polyethylene or “PEX” pipe. This is the pipe used by many plumbers across the country in new houses for hot and cold water. This material works well for multipurpose fire sprinklers. This multipurpose design and material choice keeps the maintenance cost very low and keeps the quality of the system very high.

The range of needed maintenance for a home fire sprinkler system can widely vary depending on the systems design. For instance, a multipurpose fire sprinkler system can be almost maintenance free (visually check for leaks and turn on a test valve for about a minute each year) with no cost to the homeowner. On the other end of the scale is a “stand alone” (traditional, dedicated water supply) system with an anti-backflow device that is charged with anti-freeze. This type of system will need some maintenance every year by professionals. This will include inspection of the anti-backflow device and checking the strength of the anti-freeze and recharging as needed. This can run as little as fifty to as much as hundreds of dollars per year, depending on how much anti-freeze solution you need. The “stand alone” systems are designed similar in some ways to the 13R systems and they reflect this by requiring some of the same regular maintenance. Keep in mind that maintenance is not a negative thing in commercial or high density residential structures; it is by design, to keep them running smoothly and is required by code. But 13D has no such enforceable requirements and does not need those heavy maintenance codes if we keep it simple by design.

This being said there are places where a higher maintenance, antifreeze filled system is the best choice (like a vacation home that will not be occupied in winter and will have the potable water turned off and drained to winterize the house), but they should be rare. The standard fire sprinkler design should be safe and efficient, yet simple and needing the lowest possible upkeep with the fewest parts to fail. This is going to require the sprinkler contractor to help educate fire authorities and inspectors. Many fire authorities have only seen 13 and 13R systems and have yet to learn how multipurpose systems are designed. This effort will benefit all concerned, especially the homeowner.

The house goes through other problems in its life too, like energy outages and severe weather. Let’s face it, our climate, no matter where we live, seems to throw us some interesting curve balls and the future forecasts are more of the same. The likelihood for a house to have sustained energy outage with severe cold weather is higher than the chance of fire during its lifetime in most neighborhoods.

Remember, under normal usage, within a heated house and properly insulated piping, both CPVC and PEX pipe will give fine service for many years. Think of the regular plumbing in the house…under normal usage, no anti-freeze is needed and the pipes do not break. The multipurpose system is an extension of that regular plumbing system. But, what about the not-so-normal times? What about the combination of cold weather and no power? What happens to the sprinkler system then?

As an example of what can happen, let’s look at the weather in the State on Kentucky in January of 2009, just last month. While it is common for the area to dip below freezing in the winter, nobody expected to see an ice storm come through and lay three inches of ice over a substantial part of the state. With that much ice, massive power failures occur. So now you have cold temperatures for an unexpected duration and no power to many homes. In just two to three days the interior of many homes is below freezing and there is very little the average homeowner can do to stop it. For the plumbing in these houses, insulation is turning into a moot point as the cold has fully penetrated. It should be noted that a home fire sprinkler system in this frozen condition will not fight fires…it will have to thaw out first…but it should not be doomed to bursting and flooding the house. That is just poor design and material choice.

CPVC Pipe Break
These pictures were taken in Washington State during January 2009. The house was only 6 months old and had a furnace failure. The home went without heat for about four days, causing the water inside the fire sprinkler piping to freeze and break the CPVC material. In contrast, the domestic plumbing in this house was installed with PEX piping and did not have any freeze breaks.
CPVC Pipe Break 2

Unfortunately many installers of home fire sprinklers cling to the 13R model of sprinkler systems and want to construct it out of CPVC, which is accepted by the code. However, CPVC does not handle freezing water inside it very well…it shatters. If the same home has a multipurpose system piped with PEX tubing, it has a much better chance of survival.

PEX, by its nature, will expand when frozen, and then return to its normal size when thawed, without breaking. Yes, it is possible to freeze and break PEX pipe, but it has a MUCH higher chance of making it through a freeze than CPVC. This is one of the reasons that in thousands of homes, plumbers have made the switch to PEX for their domestic water service installations in the past decade. It is also the most common choice for in floor hydronic heat. Many plumbers agree that they have MUCH less in-wall freeze breaks with PEX than with copper or CPVC.

You can see that design and material choices in the home fire sprinkler system will be making a difference here. It is about increasing the survival odds of the fire sprinkler system. Under these circumstances the choice of CPVC piping and either no antifreeze or not enough antifreeze in closed systems have doomed the fire sprinkler system to catastrophic failure. The attics in the homes in this scenario will have shattered piping waiting to thaw and then flood their attics, creating a nightmare for the homeowners to try and fix.

While a CPVC system with a large amount of antifreeze is the time tested method for a sprinkler system to have a chance of being functional during such a situation, it also generates the maximum maintenance expense to the homeowner, assuming the homeowner will stay faithful to the larger maintenance schedule (antifreeze breaks down with age and must be replaced to be effective).

Maybe some innovation is in order, to come up with other ways to prevent a system from freezing, with low to no maintenance. Even when efforts to keep it from freezing fail, the material choices made should maximize cold weather survivability. There must be a balance found between cost of long-term maintenance issues and the strength and stability of the fire sprinkler system to withstand things like power outages and surprise cold weather.

We need to design the home fire sprinkler system to survive the unexpected cold and require minimal maintenance, so it can be there to fight potential fires for decades to come.

Michael Cox serves as sales and marketing manager for 13dPEX.com, a design and distribution company in Bellingham Washington, dedicated to NFPA 13d sprinkler systems. This firm supplies design, tools, pumps, and installation materials to plumbers and others who are contracting to install 13d systems. Specializing in multipurpose or flow through design using PEX tubing as a primary material. He has worked in life-safety and fire prevention for more than two decades, holds a Washington State certificate for sprinkler design, and has worked with AHJs and Fire Chiefs through out the state. He is currently teaching a seminar program designed to prep plumbers and others to get their state certification.







  • Share This



17 Responses to “Designing the Home Fire Sprinkler System to Survive”

  1. Very helpful article. Thanks you.

    We are dealing with the City of Scottsdale, AZ and have and all-PEX plumbing system installed. If we have to install a fire sprinkler system (we are repairing damage from a sewer flood as well as termite damage) we will be insisting on an all-PEX solution under NFPA 13D.

    What’s staggering to me is that after all these years of PEX being used worldwide for plumbing, underfloor heating etc., our fire marshals and building inspectors give the impression of being ignorant and suspicious of this proven and effective material.

  2. It’s not the inspectors fault, except for 13d, pex is not used at all in fire sprinklers. It is a new material in this application in some cities.

    A lot of problems in the past came polybutylene pipe. I have found that many AHJs (fire marshals and inspectors) hear “polyethylene” (pex) and confuse the two.

    If you are breaking ground with pex piping in sprinklers in your area, share articles and other information with them. It will help smooth the way.

  3. I’m wondering about sprinkler system maintenance. I have a multi-million dollar home and a PVC sprinkler system that burst from freezing not more than 6 weeks after having the system recharged with antifreeze. To me this is unacceptable. The purported fire sprinkler system “expert” that did the maintenance turned out to be a subcontractor of somebody who is a fire marshal and runs a fire protection company as well. Now that person is blaming their sub and running from the problem. Isn’t it pretty clear that if a sprinkler pipe bursts shortly after allegedly being recharged with glycol that somebody didn’t do the job correctly?

    Ancillary questions: 1. Seems to me that a fire marshal masquerading as a fire protection company on the side is a conflict of interest. At the very least, it’s unseemly. 2. Since residential sprinkler systems are actually more like a giant IED waiting to go off and cause massive property destruction, rather than actually protecting the house from fire, why are they required in so many rural communities today? 3. Corollary to Q#2., why if sprinklers are so amazingly valuable don’t they all get installed with PEX???? This would seem a no-brainer.

    Thanks for any salient replies.

    ———

    How can it be that a system freshly recharged with anti freeze could then freeze and burst… this in a heated house albeit the system was PVC, not PEX.

    This puts the whole notion of the desirability of sprinklers in residential structures in question, IMHO. In colder climes, there would seem to be such a “ticking time bomb” liability that the sprinkler system will freeze and burst and cause stunning amounts of property damage, vs. the alternate risk of perhaps saving some of the house from a fire. Water damage can be every bit as devastating as fire and/or smoke damage.

    Just saying….

  4. Suspect one of two possible conditions existed:
    1. improper concentration of glycol relative to the total system capacity
    2. The system was not properly drained of ALL water. Glycol added to a system should be pre-mixed and then added. It will not make its way to each head. Thus, you could have had water in a drop with no glycol protection.

    In a 50% mixture, glycol will give you -60 burst point. Ice crystals will form at higher temps (around 0 degrees F) but will continue to flow. Something is amiss here.

  5. What temperature sprinkler heads do I need? I want to install sprinklers at my furnace. Do I need to braze or silver solder the copper fittings.
    Brian A foy.

  6. I like the article, it gave me some good idea’s of how to design my own fire sprinkler system.
    I was going to just run a water line with a cap at the end and add fire sprinkler heads in the line though out the house, but I was worried about air pockets and stagnet water. but know I see run it as a loop to a toilet or faucet. so the water can drip when it’s cold out or when we flush the toilet the water will be refreshed. A+++ good article.

  7. Differences between glycol and glycerine-based antifreeze?

  8. I am a fire sprinkler contractor…NICET certified, with 22 years of experience in every facet of the industry. I reside & conduct business in PA. The 2009 edition of the Uniform Const. Code is the primary law of the land (so to speak). The state legislature has passed a statewide requirement (beginning 1-1-11) that will mandate all new homes built in the commonwealth will be required to have 13D systems installed… The law does face opposition from realtors, and general contractors, claiming that a poll taken reflected potential home buyers absolute opposition somewhere around 85%… Supporters of the bill, must find a way to educate these buyers of the benefits of having these systems installed. Homeowners Insurance provides substantive reductions in premium costs. I offer all my clients free maintenance & inspections for 2 years. I believe that education is vital for detractors of this legislation. Any assistance this forum could share with me to provide educational tools, studies of data, anything that can assist me in easing the concerns of my clients would be greatly appreciated… I am very glad this forum exists, and hope that it will provide these tools to educate the consumer.
    Thank You All-
    Scott Emmonds

  9. will PEX melt/w water in the piping under fire conditions?

  10. why does everyone want wet lines? why not have a dry system with a solenoid and actuator? if you did it this way, pipes would never freeze. you would also be able to tie-in to your home sercurity alarm for battery back up and activation. better yet why not tie it into smoke detectors and air pressure sensor with two solenoids, this would give you dual saftey. you would need both a smoke and a broken head before water filled pipes?

  11. there are several problems related to the use of pex pipe for sprinkler system…

    1 . pex will freeze but not break
    this is good for the homeowner only

    if you are a contractor and the pex pipe residential fire sprinkler system freezes then that home has a fire which does extensive damage ( please pray that no one dies in this fire ) owners insurance company sues the sprinkler contractor and his insurance company
    who is at fault… how does the contractor prove the system was inoperable because of event beyond his control
    i speak from personal experience about this
    in 1987 88 i installed approved polybutylene
    ( not the same material but it will not break if frozen)fire sprinkler systems at a company that
    did @ 5 million worth of this business alone
    the problem is as stated earlier …
    contracting and installing a residential fire sprinkler system is solely for saving lives
    how is FROZEN PEX going do accomplish that
    in a court of law your judgement will be called into question ( as it may be very hard for your lawyers to prove the pipe was frozen at the time of the fire ) also the issue of your business ethics..are you minimising the singular goal of saving lives to make money..
    this may not sound like much of a problem but
    the homeowner who lost his house or pets or loved ones is going to generate a lot of sympathy

    the assumption that any frozen pipe fire sprinkler system is good for home owners or contractors or the residential fire sprinkler industry is ridiculous.. what would be good for everyone involved would be a residential dry piped system.. this would require a considerable effort by nfpa to save EVERYONE
    the considerable problem of frozen / breaking pipe in there homes … the other major hurdle
    is to get all home builders to care enough to
    make accommodations for the safe installation of residential fire sprinkler system ..
    and lastly the education of all home owners
    about the need to keep the heat on or turn off and drain your system
    the residential fire sprinkler industry has a daunting task ahead

  12. John Young. Temperatures that fall significantly below the design temperature range as required by a juristiction at some point are surely considered an Act of God, and therefore beyond the scope of any warranty of liability. How is that different to a roof correctly designed for 1′ snow load collapsing under 5′ of snow, or a roof designed for 90 mph winds blowing off because of a recorded freak wind.

    Surely if the homeowner is informed in the small print, or large print for that matter, the limitations of a sprinkler system that is fully compliant with all required codes…then how can that fall back on you. Its not as if the homeowner will be given a false sense of security that they have a 100% safe system, when its actually only 99% effective…whose famous last words were ‘Go back to bed honey, the sprinklers will take care of that fire in the living room.’ The bottom line is a system that is fully funcional for 360 days a year is better than no system.

  13. This article and it’s comments are very beneficial for teaching options, pros and cons.
    As an independent insurance broker in CA, I’ve
    seen hundreds of fires where damages could’ve been minimized, and lives could’ve been saved,
    if there were working fire sprinklers and alarms.

    With all of the talk about putting Americans back to work, I think it’s really criminal that
    13D residential fire sprinklers are not mandated for both new and retro fits. Maybe the dry system would solve the problems of freezing and leaking? I’ve never even been asked if I favor fire sprinklers or not, so I
    question the validity of a realtor’s survey suggesting that 85% of homeowners disapprove of
    a fire sprinkler system. If 1/3 to 1/2 of the
    US population lives in freeze areas, then it would be understandable that they need to be
    sure they are not installing a water bomb in their home. In the San Francisco area where we
    live, our homes don’t freeze, but our CPVC is
    vulnerable to rats.
    Basically, nothing’s perfect.

  14. I know it has been awhile since the question was asked but yes, pex will melt with water in it. I am a firefighter. We went to a fire in a house that had a pex system. The fire melted the pex, water sprayed out and extinguished the fire before we even got there.

  15. I would like to make a couple of statements here. 1. To V. Merit, this was all the fault of the sprinkler service provided you. There is tons of evidence that shows that fire sprinkler systems cause far less damage to homes and business and if properly, and I mean properly, maintained, they will save you and your families lives in the event of a fire. So often we have individuals in this trade that come to work for a paycheck and not for the seriousness of the systems that we install and maintain. I am an inspector and service man for fire protection systems and have been at it for 18 years and I can tell you it’s all about taking your job serious. I lived just two blocks from the 9 fireman that lost their lives in the Sofa Super Store fire in Charleston, SC and if the system had been maintained and updated, instead of grandfathered, those men would be alive today. Believe in your system but be selective of the company you hire to maintain it. There are some videos on YouTube that show side by side comparisons of a house with sprinklers and one with out, watch one of those videos and see the difference, I believe it will change your mind about whether they are needed. I believe every house and business in America should have a fire sprinkler system in them, one life is worth more than the cost 2. To Brian Foy, 212 degree Quick Responce Sprinkler head is uselly the choice but have the head protected when the HVAC tech is conecting the set lines to the A-coil. The heat from the torch in such a small space can set off the head. Either wait to install the head until the furnice is installed completely or rap the head with a heat blanket.

  16. I recently had a test/inspection of the fire sprinkler system in my home. There were two issues found. The bell did not ring when the inspectors test valve was flowed (this was corrected with a new flow switch) and second the pressure dropped from 65psi to about 35-40 psi when the inspectors test valve flowed. Also, when the main drain was opened, the pressure dropped from 65psi to nearly 0psi. The city inspector was clueless, had no suggestions, hadn’t seen that happen before, etc. In the meantime I am left with no one at the city willing to point me in the right direction to get this addressed. Any suggestions or comments would be greatly appreciated.

  17. I’d like to use PEX but it seems that plumbing with it incurs a significant penalty in allowable length (compare NFPA13d 10.4.9.2(e) to 10.4.9.2(g)) … it seems just shy of 4x length allowed for CPVC 0.75″ vs. the same size of PEX.

    I know the tables include fitting losses, are the crimp fittings really that much worse ?

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Submit a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You must be logged in to post a comment.

About the author

icon

Michael Cox